Articles · Guides

What do buyers ask Google and AI about holding companies?

In November 2026 we looked at what people type into Google and Bing, and ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI answers, about building a holding company through acquisitions. The questions cluster into five groups: how to set up and build a holding company, how to pay for the second deal and beyond, whether and how a small holding company can go public, how the models compare (search fund, self-funded search, independent sponsor, holding company, private equity), and whether business-buying courses are worth the money. The answers that rank today come mostly from law firms, LLC-formation websites, individual operators' newsletters, forum threads and finance glossaries. They are good on definitions and entity setup. They are thin or silent on funding deals two through ten, on paying sellers in stock at small scale, and on taking a company with $1 million to $20 million of revenue public. This article explains what we found, how to judge any answer you get, and how we write ours.

The questions people actually ask

These are the recurring questions, grouped. If you have asked one of them, you are in good company.

Building the holding company. How do you build a holding company for acquisitions? Should it be an LLC or a C-corp? How do you set one up for multiple LLCs? What does it cost? Can you build a "Berkshire Hathaway for small businesses"?

Paying for deal two and beyond. How do you fund a second acquisition while running the first? Can you use an SBA loan for a second business? What do you do after you hit the $5 million SBA 7(a) cap? Can a seller take stock instead of cash? What changed under SBA SOP 50 10 8.1 in October 2026?

Going public. How does a small company go public? Direct listing or reverse merger? Should my holding company go public, and at what size? What are Nasdaq's rules now?

Choosing a model. Traditional search fund or self-funded search? Self-funded searcher or independent sponsor? Holding company versus private equity versus search fund? What is a serial acquirer, and how is it different from a roll-up?

Courses and advisers. Are business-buying courses and masterminds worth it? Who advises acquisition entrepreneurs? What should a mentor actually give you?

Who answers them today

The first page of results, and the sources AI assistants lean on, come from a handful of source types.

  • Law firms and legal marketplaces own the going-public questions and much of the entity-structure material. One securities law firm's posts, several of them from the mid-2010s, dominate the direct listing versus reverse merger comparison.
  • LLC-formation and small-business publishers rank for "how to start a holding company" and "buy a business with no money down." They are written for a general audience and reviewed by editors, not practitioners.
  • Operator newsletters on Substack, beehiiv and Kit rank for the practitioner questions: building a holdco, funding deal two, the search fund versus independent sponsor comparison. Some are excellent. Few cite sources.
  • Forum threads, especially on Searchfunder, rank for SBA rule changes and for course skepticism. A thread titled on the share of course buyers who never buy a business ranks on page one for "business buying course worth it."
  • Finance glossaries and training sites (Corporate Finance Institute, WallStreetMojo, Wall Street Prep, Wikipedia for "serial acquirer") own the definitions: multiple arbitrage, roll-up, stock versus cash consideration.
  • M&A software and advisory firms publish the longest guides, 3,000 to 6,000 words, aimed at private equity readers or home-services acquirers.

Where the top answers fall short

We read the strongest pages for each group of questions. The gaps were consistent.

  1. Going public is explained for large companies. The pages that rank for "how to take a small company public" and "should my holding company go public" walk through a conventional IPO: hire underwriters, file an S-1, do a roadshow. Direct listings and reverse mergers get a table row each. The OTCQB, which is where most companies of this size actually start, is often not mentioned. Nothing addresses a holding company that wants to use its stock to buy businesses.
  2. Funding the second deal is answered by UK lenders. Several of the top results for "how to fund a second business acquisition" are from UK law firms and finance brokers. The US-specific questions, what happens at the SBA cap and how seller notes, rollover equity and investor equity fit together at deal three, are answered mainly in forum threads.
  3. Paying a seller in stock is treated as corporate finance theory. The ranking pages compare cash and stock consideration for public-company mergers. The questions a small acquirer has, whether the seller can sell the stock, what Rule 144 means, how a lockup works, how to value private or thinly traded stock, are not addressed.
  4. Old content presented as current. A frequently cited introduction to acquisition entrepreneurship was published in 2018 and still ranks. SBA down payment rules, Nasdaq listing standards and SBA loan caps have all changed since.
  5. Figures without sources. Setup costs, "typical" multiples, the share of baby boomers who own businesses, the percentage of valuation lost to a bad structure: these appear across the top pages with no citation. Some are plausible. Some are repeated from page to page until they look like facts.
  6. No named practitioner, or no relevant track record. Several ranking pages have no author. Others name an author whose credentials are in a different field from the question being answered.

How AI assistants decide what to cite

AI answers are built from the same web, with some differences in what they favor. Studies published in 2026 are consistent on a few points. A matched-pair analysis of about 96,000 URLs (SISTRIX data, summarized October 2026) found that pages with a current year in the title, question-style headings, a visible last-updated date, a named author, tables and lists, 1,000 words or more, and ten or more outbound links to sources were cited more often by ChatGPT and Google's AI features. A study of 10,000 citations across B2B queries found ChatGPT leaning heavily on Wikipedia and company-owned pages, while Perplexity and Google's AI Mode drew far more on Reddit, YouTube and forums. An October 2026 fintech study found ChatGPT citing company websites and regulator pages for "how do I" questions, and Google's AI Mode spreading citations across lists and forums. These are correlations, not rules, and the engines change often. But the pattern is clear: the engines reward pages that answer the question directly, show their sources and say who wrote them and when.

How to judge any answer you get

Whether it comes from a search result, a newsletter or an AI assistant, run the answer through five checks before you act on it.

  1. Is it dated? SBA rules changed on October 1, 2026. Nasdaq's rules changed in April 2025, December 2025, January 2026 and again in late October 2026. An undated answer about either is probably wrong.
  2. Does it cite primary sources? For SBA, that is the SOP itself. For listing rules, the exchange rulebook or the SEC release. For deal terms, a filing or a study, not another blog.
  3. Who wrote it, and have they done the thing? A securities lawyer can explain a Form 10. Someone who has taken companies public can tell you which route to take and why, and what went wrong the last time.
  4. Does it answer your size? Most going-public content is written for companies raising $50 million or more. Most roll-up content is written for private equity. If the page never mentions a number near yours, it is not about you.
  5. What is it selling? Every page, including this one, is published by someone with an interest. A law firm wants a client; a course wants a student; a lender wants a borrower; we want you to buy the Playbook. That does not make the content wrong. It tells you what to double-check.

How we write these articles

The articles on this site are built to pass those checks, because that is what we would want as readers. Each one opens with a direct answer, then the reasoning, then the sources. Each names its author, Joel Arberman, who has taken 17 companies public, closed 8 M&A transactions and prepared more than 30 private placements over 30 years, and each carries the month it was last reviewed. Figures link to the SOP, the rulebook, the SEC release, the filing or the study they came from, and when a figure is from our own work we say so. When something is our opinion rather than a rule, it is written as "my view." Every article ends with a disclaimer that we are an advisory firm, not a law firm, accounting firm or broker-dealer, because that is true and it matters. There are now about 200 articles, organized in three groups: building a holding company, taking one public, and buying your first business.

The gaps we are filling

The analysis above pointed at questions that nobody answers well for a company of this size. We have written or are writing on each: direct listing or reverse merger for a small company in 2026; funding acquisitions two through ten without more SBA debt; paying a seller with stock and what Rule 144 and lockups mean for sellers who take it; holding company versus private equity versus serial acquirer; and whether a holding company with $1 million to $5 million of revenue can go public. If you have a question we have not answered, ask it on the application form and we will write it up.

Where these findings come from: our own review of Google and Bing results for about 20 queries in November 2026 and of the pages that ranked; the Vizup summary of SISTRIX data (October 29, 2026); the GrackerAI citation study (2026); the Omnius fintech AI visibility study (November 3, 2026); and the DigitalApplied review of 15 citation studies (November 5, 2026). Search results vary by location, device and day, so your results will differ from ours.

Related questions

Should I trust an AI assistant's answer about SBA loans or going public?

Treat it as a well-read friend, not a lawyer. Ask it for its sources, open them, and check the dates. For anything with a rule attached, read the rule.

Why do forum threads rank so well for these questions?

Because they are specific, recent and written by people doing the work, and because search engines and AI assistants have learned that readers trust them. The trade-off is that nobody checks them, so read several and look for agreement.

Are newsletters on Substack or beehiiv reliable?

The good ones are written by operators and are more useful than most published guides. Judge each by the same five checks: date, sources, author, size and what it sells.

What should I search for if I want practitioner answers?

Add your size and your situation to the query: "second acquisition SBA cap seller note" finds better material than "how to buy a business." Specific questions surface specific answers.

What comes next

If your question is which model fits you, start with ETA, search fund, independent sponsor or holding company. If it is how to build the thing, start with how to build a holding company for acquisitions.

Related articles

Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC, an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm. This article is general information, not legal, tax or investment advice.

Not sure where to start?

Start with the playbook. The first conversation is free.

Meraki Dealmakers is a service of Meraki Partners, LLC.

Meraki Partners, LLC is an advisory firm. It is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, business broker, law firm or accounting firm, and does not solicit investors or receive compensation based on capital raised.

© 2026 Meraki Partners, LLC

The Playbook Raise Grow Go Public About FAQ Apply Privacy